Last updated: June 2026

The safeguards are missing

Airspace safety approval is not community consent

Airspace safety approval is not the same as community consent, planning permission, environmental assessment or social licence.

A drone route may be considered safe from an aviation perspective and still be unacceptable over residential communities. That is the gap residents are living with: commercial drone delivery can advance faster than the public systems needed to assess noise, privacy, wildlife, planning and community impact.

Until those safeguards exist and are enforceable, routine food-delivery drone flights over residential communities should stop.

What airspace approval does not answer

Airspace safety processes may address how drones operate safely in the air. They do not, by themselves, answer whether repeated commercial food-delivery routes are acceptable over homes, gardens, schools, parks and green spaces.

1. The promise

National Policy Framework for UAS — Action 2: "A National Working Group on UAS Geographical Zones, led by the Irish Aviation Authority, will be established to develop transparent processes and procedures for the designation of UAS Geographical Zones." Action 3: "Relevant State agencies, government departments and local government will determine and request UAS Geographical Zones through the Irish Aviation Authority in line with the processes and procedures developed through the National Working Group on UAS Geographical Zones."

Source: gov.ie — National Policy Framework for Unmanned Aircraft Systems

2. The timeline (their own plan)

The 2026 Implementation Action Plan, published by the Department of Transport, sets out exactly when the transparent process is supposed to be built. Read it carefully:

Q2 2026

Establish the Working Group. Determine membership. Begin Terms of Reference.

Q3–Q4 2026

Develop "transparent processes & procedures for the establishment of UAS Geographical Zones for environmental and privacy reasons."

Q4 2026

Working Group submits proposal for legislative impact analysis and approval.

2027

Action 3 — actually requesting zones in line with the new process — "to commence in 2027."

Source: gov.ie — Implementation Action Plan 2026

3. The reality

While the working group is still being assembled, the IAA has already designated commercial drone corridors:

Zone U97 — Dublin 15

Designated specifically for Manna over Blanchardstown and surrounding residential areas. Approved with no transparent public process. No public consultation. No appeal mechanism.

Cork — early 2026

A second geographical zone designated for Manna in Cork. Granted before the National Working Group on UAS Geographical Zones had even agreed Terms of Reference.

The State has said so itself

"Work has been underway to review UAS geographical zones ahead of the establishment of the National Working Group on UAS Geographical Zones."

— Implementation Action Plan 2026, "Actions in 2025" section

4. Regulatory independence and public confidence

The Irish Aviation Authority is the body designating these zones. It is largely self-funded through charges on the aviation sector it regulates — including the drone operators it oversees, such as Manna — rather than by the State.

The IAA granted a further zone for Manna in Cork while the working group meant to govern that kind of decision had yet to show visible progress. Whatever the intent, this is the kind of perceived or structural conflict that affects public confidence, and it is fair to ask how that timing sits.

Many of the safeguards — fixed charge offences, inter-agency enforcement, training for An Garda Síochána — are not scheduled to be in place until late 2026 or 2027, well after commercial operations over residential communities have already begun.

What we are asking the State to do

1. Stop new zones

No new UAS Geographical Zones over residential areas until the National Working Group has published agreed transparent procedures.

2. Review existing zones

Subject Zone U97 and the Cork zone to retrospective public consultation under the same procedures.

3. Residential exclusion by default

Legislate a clear right for residents to exclude routine commercial drone overflight of homes and gardens — not only after individual complaints.

4. Independent regulator

State funding for the regulatory function, removing the structural conflict where the IAA is paid by the operators it oversees.

5. Independent monitoring

Independent monitoring of noise, route density and cumulative exposure — published openly.

6. Real enforcement first

Fixed charge offences, inter-agency mechanisms and Garda training operational before any further expansion.

Take action Report impact Contact