Evidence

The resident-facing case, in one place

Routine food-delivery drone routes over residential communities create impacts that go beyond aviation safety.

This evidence hub brings together the resident-facing issues: noise, visibility and privacy, wildlife and environment, planning, safeguards, and the public record.

The campaign position is clear: homes are not delivery corridors. Routine food-delivery drone flights over residential communities should stop.

Noise over homes

Repeated flights, hovering and descent, quiet areas, and cumulative disturbance — why drone noise grates more than its decibel level suggests.

Noise over homes →

Visibility and privacy

The visible overhead presence above gardens, windows and outdoor space — a privacy impact without requiring proof of surveillance.

Visibility and privacy →

Wildlife and environment

Residential areas include gardens, birds, bats, pets, pollinators and wildlife corridors. Incomplete evidence supports caution, not expansion.

Wildlife and environment →

Safeguards and policy gap

Airspace safety approval is not community consent, planning approval, environmental assessment, or social licence.

Safeguards and policy gap →

News and public record

Planning decisions, consultations, public reporting, and regulatory updates from Cork, Dublin and beyond.

News and public record →

Source documents and templates

Consultation documents, planning objection templates, TD letters, and share materials.

Source documents and templates →

Homes are not delivery corridors. Routine food-delivery drone flights over residential communities should stop.

Take action Report impact Contact